Increased solar activity is not responsible for global warming, new study proves

Critics who say that global warming is not man has just lost one of its "strong" arguments recently in a new study has finally settled once and for all that Sunday does not matter to the climate change we are now beginning to experience. The star has any influence on the ice sheets, and does not lead to glaciers around the world to melt, "says the report. Human activity is the main factor leading to global warming, especially billion tonnes of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that we emit into the atmosphere per year. Those who say otherwise have no scientific support for their claims.

Some scientists have argued that changes in the sun go through at this point, one of the factors that cause global warming. But a group of experts from Carnegie Mellon University and Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada, has recently developed a new model, where the controversial theory to the test. The hypothesis is widely used by oil company lobbyists and other individuals, maintaining the scientific fact that global warming caused by greenhouse gases.

They say that more solar activity produces more solar radiation, which in turn eliminate more clouds in the atmosphere. As a direct result, more sunlight falls on the surface of the earth and the heat of the planet. Strangely enough, their explanation of global warming as greenhouse gases, droughts, floods and so on. Details of the latest model are published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, and as specified in the May 1 issue of the journal Science.

"So far, proponents of this hypothesis could be argued that the sun can cause global warming, because nobody had a computer to really test the claims. The basic problem with the hypothesis that solar variations probably change the new particle accelerator formation rates by less than 30 percent of the atmosphere. These particles are very small and need to grow before they can affect the clouds. Most do not survive, said Peter Adams. He is a Carnegie Mellon Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and also one of the leading developers of the new model, Science Daily reports.

"No simulation of something as complex as the atmosphere will be perfect. Supporters of the cosmic ray hypothesis are likely to try to challenge these results, but the effect is so weak in our model, it is difficult for us to change this basic result" Adams added. Some people try every detail of a sound scientific research, only to say that something else is causing global warming. The interests behind them are not difficult to discern.